-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
bib.bib
107 lines (97 loc) · 7.22 KB
/
bib.bib
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
@incollection{hamakerWhyResearchersShould2012,
title = {Why Researchers Should Think "within-Person": {{A}} Paradigmatic Rationale},
shorttitle = {Why Researchers Should Think "within-Person"},
booktitle = {Handbook of Research Methods for Studying Daily Life},
author = {Hamaker, Ellen L.},
year = {2012},
pages = {43--61},
publisher = {{The Guilford Press}},
address = {{New York, NY, US}},
url = {https://www.guilford.com/books/Handbook-of-Research-Methods-for-Studying-Daily-Life/Mehl-Conner/9781462513055},
abstract = {This chapter presents reasoning for taking an alternative research approach to the study of processes that unfold within individuals over time as part of their daily lives. To this end I focus on three issues. First, I present a brief historical account that shows the large-sample approach is not necessarily the only appropriate research approach in psychology. Second, I discuss the limitations of this approach, specifically, if our interest is in studying psychological processes that take place within individuals. Finally, I discuss several alternatives to the standard large-sample approach that allow us to take a closer and more detailed look at the processes as they are occurring in daily life. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)},
file = {/Users/solomonkurz/Zotero/storage/7IAKF3TS/2012-05165-003.html},
isbn = {978-1-60918-747-7 978-1-60918-749-1},
keywords = {Cognitive Processes,Experiences (Events),Experimental Psychologists,Experimentation,History,Methodology,Personality Processes}
}
@article{kievitSimpsonParadoxPsychological2013,
title = {Simpson's Paradox in Psychological Science: A Practical Guide},
shorttitle = {Simpson's Paradox in Psychological Science},
author = {Kievit, Rogier and Frankenhuis, Willem Eduard and Waldorp, Lourens and Borsboom, Denny},
year = {2013},
volume = {4},
publisher = {{Frontiers}},
issn = {1664-1078},
doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00513},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00513/full},
urldate = {2020-06-17},
abstract = {The direction of an association at the population-level may be reversed within the subgroups comprising that population\textemdash a striking observation called Simpson's paradox. When facing this pattern, psychologists often view it as anomalous. Here, we argue that Simpson's paradox is more common than conventionally thought, and typically results in incorrect interpretations \textendash{} potentially with harmful consequences. We support this claim by drawing on empirical results from cognitive neuroscience, behavior genetics, psychopathology, personality psychology, educational psychology, intelligence research, and simulation studies. We show that Simpson's Paradox is most likely to occur when inferences are drawn across different levels of explanation (e.g., from populations to subgroups, or subgroups to individuals). We propose a set of statistical markers indicative of the paradox, and offer psychometric solutions for dealing with the paradox when encountered\textemdash including a toolbox in R for detecting Simpson's Paradox. We show that explicit modeling of situations in which the paradox might occur not only prevents incorrect interpretations of data, but also results in a deeper understanding of what data tell us about the world.},
file = {/Users/solomonkurz/Zotero/storage/2DI5JTLT/Kievit et al. - 2013 - Simpson's paradox in psychological science a prac.pdf},
journal = {Frontiers in Psychology},
keywords = {ecological fallacy,Measurement,Paradox,Reductionism,simpson's paradox,statistical inference},
language = {English}
}
@book{R-tibble,
title = {{{tibble}}: {{Simple}} Data Frames},
author = {M{\"u}ller, Kirill and Wickham, Hadley},
year = {2020},
url = {https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tibble}
}
@book{R-tidyverse,
title = {{{tidyverse}}: {{Easily}} Install and Load the 'Tidyverse'},
author = {Wickham, Hadley},
year = {2019},
url = {https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyverse}
}
@article{robinsonEcologicalCorrelations1950,
title = {Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals},
author = {Robinson, W. S.},
year = {1950},
volume = {15},
doi = {10.2307/2087176},
url = {https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/38/2/337/658252},
journal = {American Sociological Review},
language = {English},
number = {3},
page = {351-357}
}
@article{selvinDurkheimSuicideProblems1958,
title = {Durkheim's Suicide and Problems of Empirical Research},
author = {Selvin, Hanan C.},
year = {1958},
month = may,
volume = {63},
pages = {607--619},
publisher = {{The University of Chicago Press}},
issn = {0002-9602},
doi = {10.1086/222356},
url = {https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/33024288/Durkheim-suicide_empirical-research-problems.pdf?1392728055=\&response-content-disposition=inline\%3B+filename\%3DDurkheims_Suicide_and_Problems_of_Empiri.pdf\&Expires=1603941022\&Signature=K1tMxgcPcR5d28KgPUDAxH6-F~aLs2nqXGiNhJpgcqxSXPo0rjqqnsImLGvv-FdfdYGIeMtKWhRmeZG4RFnHRDQOXTguGsirusuch7WEVeDdaR1YUEia6fwlg~SHYERWbBPTCGuB0vqxHlQgGyzkfy7yaTOCfvMdbu-EH-HYEnmm8EBv2xFtejMhkXoSf-HwkPrDf3HCrIzquq2vpXA260McsZWl6PBJ-C542SGQ7V9iEdpJly8Y0mjLUriqddPWkxZKR35NKRlPTd53kU1F11NCMaYy3vuA9zEHqadXTMAWIQzJRbvrYbAeP5uOp2aaRLIwiMVbFGeYvWwxkDl8wg__\&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA},
urldate = {2020-10-26},
abstract = {The theoretical content of Suicide has been thoroughly discussed, but relatively little attention has been paid to the ways in which Durkheim tested and refined his theories with empirical data. Durkheim's empirical analyses are multivariate: each additional variable is systematically incorporated into the relationships that have perviously been studied. The analyses are also replicative: the same relationship is studied in widely varying contexts. A careful study of the consequences of these procedures, both intended and unintended, yields valuable insights into current problems of theoretically oriented empirical research.},
file = {/Users/solomonkurz/Zotero/storage/W43S8E9I/222356.html},
journal = {American Journal of Sociology},
number = {6}
}
@article{thorndikeFallacyImputingCorrelations1939,
title = {On the Fallacy of Imputing the Correlations Found for Groups to the Individuals or Smaller Groups Composing Them},
author = {Thorndike, E. L.},
year = {1939},
volume = {52},
pages = {122--124},
publisher = {{University of Illinois Press}},
issn = {0002-9556},
doi = {10.2307/1416673},
url = {https://www.jstor.org/stable/1416673},
urldate = {2020-10-26},
journal = {The American Journal of Psychology},
number = {1}
}
@article{wickhamWelcomeTidyverse2019,
title = {Welcome to the Tidyverse},
author = {Wickham, Hadley and Averick, Mara and Bryan, Jennifer and Chang, Winston and McGowan, Lucy D'Agostino and Fran{\c c}ois, Romain and Grolemund, Garrett and Hayes, Alex and Henry, Lionel and Hester, Jim and Kuhn, Max and Pedersen, Thomas Lin and Miller, Evan and Bache, Stephan Milton and M{\"u}ller, Kirill and Ooms, Jeroen and Robinson, David and Seidel, Dana Paige and Spinu, Vitalie and Takahashi, Kohske and Vaughan, Davis and Wilke, Claus and Woo, Kara and Yutani, Hiroaki},
year = {2019},
volume = {4},
pages = {1686},
doi = {10.21105/joss.01686},
journal = {Journal of Open Source Software},
number = {43}
}