You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When looking at morphisms $\phi: P \to P_{type}$ its often the case that $P_{type}$ will only have a small number of transitions and places. In that case, it would be nice to use color to visualize the data of the morphism, rather than edges, which do rather strange things with the graph placement algorithm and get somewhat unreadable for even moderately sized petri nets (see ex from docs):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Also, in large PNs it becomes rather hard to see what is going on. I wonder if adding invisible edges (like is done to ease bipartite graph viz in Catlab) between transitions of the same type in the domain PN would help the graph placement algorithm produce more readable graphs?
I also am not sure if graphviz provides a way to put strict bounds on the ratio of size between the largest and smallest shapes used to draw nodes, for example. In the above plot, the type Petri net is almost indistinguishable.
When looking at morphisms$\phi: P \to P_{type}$ its often the case that $P_{type}$ will only have a small number of transitions and places. In that case, it would be nice to use color to visualize the data of the morphism, rather than edges, which do rather strange things with the graph placement algorithm and get somewhat unreadable for even moderately sized petri nets (see ex from docs):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: