You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Fuel has always had a deep focus on state-minimized blockchain architecture. Due to our UTXO model, either part of all of our state could be packaged into a single potentially constant sized accumulator representing either some or all of our unspent or spent UTXOs.
This could mean that the state of all native assets or contracts could be accumulated into a single payload under something like 1kb.
Pros
Reduced IO
State size minimization
Cons
Less rich accessible state
P2P
Data-availability
Execution cost
A Gradient Of Node Operation Modes
Light Client - headers
Light Full Node - headers, compressed state, contract state
Full Node - headers, entire state
Partial Archival Node - headers, block data, compressed state
Archive Node - headers, entire state, all pruneable data
Abstract
Fuel has always had a deep focus on state-minimized blockchain architecture. Due to our UTXO model, either part of all of our state could be packaged into a single potentially constant sized accumulator representing either some or all of our unspent or spent UTXOs.
This could mean that the state of all native assets or contracts could be accumulated into a single payload under something like 1kb.
Pros
Cons
A Gradient Of Node Operation Modes
Approaches
Prior Art
with Applications to IOPs and
Stateless Blockchains
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: