-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 72
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Documentation on existing tables of External Validation methods #147
Comments
Thanks for submitting your first issue! |
And for internal validation: https://nas.ewi.tudelft.nl/people/Piet/papers/TUDreport20111111_MetricList.pdf |
I drafted some of the external indices for pair counting
|
For:
|
That's interesting. |
@GiulioRossetti so A is True Positive pairs (when nodes A and B are in the same partition in both cases), and D is True Negative pairs. (when nodes A and B are in a different partition in both cases), and B/C is when the node pair of the ground truth does not match the node pair of the prediction. For further reference:
|
Thanks for the clarification. Ok per A (which is TP) and D (which is TN) but B and C are not interchangeable. I assume that B is FP and C is FN, am I right? |
@GiulioRossetti they are interchangeable in most cases, but in the Fager_McGowan, McConnaughey, Minkowski, Wallance and Yule they are not. In Wallace(A,B)=a/(a+b) case, b is when the node pair is in the same partition in A but different partitions in B. |
A weird side thought:
|
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
There are set-matching and other external indices for comparing expected community labels and output labels from a CD algorithm, it is something that is worth noting. separate from #114 as they seem irrelevant from one another.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: