Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider switching back to pip-audit #49

Open
woodruffw opened this issue Jul 3, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Consider switching back to pip-audit #49

woodruffw opened this issue Jul 3, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
@woodruffw
Labels
in progress

Comments

@woodruffw
Copy link
Member

We switched to osv-scanner because of a significant performance regression in pip-audit. That regression has now been fixed with the 2.6.0 release, so we should consider switching back.

Low priority since the performance of osv-scanner is probably good enough, and the data quality should be similar.
@woodruffw woodruffw self-assigned this Jul 3, 2023
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label May 23, 2024
@woodruffw woodruffw removed the Stale label May 23, 2024
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Jun 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@woodruffw woodruffw

Labels
in progress
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@woodruffw