Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
145 lines (122 loc) · 8.13 KB

index.md

File metadata and controls

145 lines (122 loc) · 8.13 KB
layout header title excerpt organizers_row schedule
splash
overlay_color overlay_filter overlay_image caption
#5e616c
0.5
assets/images/header_from_unsplash_dot_com.jpg
Photo credit: [**Unsplash**](https://unsplash.com)
Interaction-driven Behavior Prediction and Planning for Autonomous Vehicles
An IV2024 workshop.
image_path alt person_name person_affiliation
Sascha
Sascha Hornauer
MINES Paris
image_path alt person_name person_affiliation
Max
Maximilian Naumann
Bosch Center for Artificial Intelligence (BCAI)
image_path alt person_name person_affiliation
Marcel
Marcel Hallgarten
University of Tübingen / Bosch
image_path alt person_name person_affiliation
Eike
Eike Rehder
Robert Bosch GmbH
image_path alt person_name person_affiliation
Jiachen
Jiachen Li
Stanford University
image_path alt person_name person_affiliation
Wei
Wei Zhan
University of California at Berkeley
image_path alt person_name person_affiliation
Martin
Martin Lauer
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
image_path alt person_name person_affiliation
Masayoshi
Masayoshi Tomizuka
University of California at Berkeley
image_path alt person_name person_affiliation
Arnaud
Arnaud de La Fortelle
Heex Technologies
image_path alt person_name person_affiliation
Christoph
Christoph Stiller
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
time event content
8:45 - 9:00
Organizers
Welcome
time event content
9:00 - 9:30
Abhishek Vivekanadan
A Review of Reward Functions for Reinforcement Learning in the context of Autonomous Driving
time event content
9:30 - 10:00
Steffen Hagedorn
The key to proactive traffic interaction: Overcoming sequential integration of prediction and planning – a survey perspective
time event content
10:00 - 10:30
Krzysztof Czarnecki
Interaction-driven marginal and joint trajectory prediction
time break
10:30 - 11:00
Coffee Break
time event content
11:00 - 11:30
Anna Meszaros
TrajFlow: Learning Distributions over Trajectories for Human Behavior Prediction
time event content
11:30 - 12:00
Tobias Demmler
Towards Consistent and Explainable Motion Prediction using Heterogeneous Graph Attention
time break
12:00 - 13:00
Lunch Break
time event content
13:00 - 14:00
Abhishek Vivekanadan
KI-PMF: Knowledge Integrated Plausible Motion Forecasting
time event content
14:00 - 14:30
Zhexi Lian
Anti-bullying Adaptive Cruise Control: a proactive right-of-way protection approach
time break
14:30 - 15:00
Coffee Break
time event content
15:00 - 15:30
Changsun Ahn
Evaluating and Enhancing the Human-like Interaction Features of Autonomous Vehicles
time event content
15:30 - 16:00
Johannes Betz
Occlusion-aware Motion Planning in Uncertain Environments
time event content
16:00 - 16:30
TBA
Panel Discussion
time event content
16:30 - 16:40
Organizers
Conclusion

This workshop will be held at the 35rd IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), on June 2 - 5, 2024 Jeju Shinhwa World, Jeju Island, Korea

Topics

The topics of interest of the workshop include, but are not limited to:

  • Cooperative and comprehensible motion planning
  • Probabilistic decision making and motion planning (including MDPs, POMDPs, MMDPs)
  • Probabilistic behavior prediction (with help of semantic high-definition maps)
  • Second-order effects in heavy interactive scenarios
  • Evaluation and benchmarking of the aforementioned topics

Important Deadlines:

  • February 01, 2024: Workshop Paper Submission Deadline (firm deadline, no extension)
  • March 30, 2024: Workshop Paper Notification of Acceptance
  • April 22, 2024: Workshop Final Paper Submission Deadline
  • Workshop: Eorimok Room. 8:30 - 16:30. 2nd of June

Please check the official program for potential updates: https://ieee-iv.org/2024/program/

Workshop Content

Research on Automated Vehicles has experienced vast progress over the last decades. Today, first prototypes are sufficiently safe to drive on selected roads in public traffic. Nevertheless, safety comes at the price of overly conservative behavior, leading to inconvenient situations, for example, at unprotected left turns or merging scenarios. Presumably, the main reasons for this behavior include (a) errors in the prediction of other traffic participants, especially in interactive scenarios and (b) the lack of probabilistic considerations in motion planning.

Comfortable Automated Driving: While safety should never be put at risk, worst case behavior of others should not be the default for the motion plan of an automated vehicle. Rather, with a safe reaction to such worst case behavior always in reserve the intended trajectory should be comfortable, less conservative and thereby potentially closer to human expectations. Proposal and exchange of these kind of approaches is the first aim of the workshop.

Multimodal Behavior Prediction: For such behavior, sophisticated behavior prediction approaches for other traffic participants are necessary, going beyond constant velocity assumptions. Predictions must be probabilistic and allow for maneuver options for other vehicles. Often, there is not “the right prediction”, but many. The choice is influenced by destinations as much as individual driving behaviors and potentially even the drivers’ mood. Thus, a simple evaluation against a ground truth is not possible. Prediction approaches, including but not limited to machine learning based approaches, as well as proposals for their evaluation, are the second main goal of this workshop.

Comprehensible Automated Driving: For motion planning in highly interactive scenarios alike, a “ground truth” or “best option” may not exist. To be comprehensible and predictable for other road users, a good plan should be a subset of an expected prediction for a vehicle in the same situation. The combination of planning and prediction, including but not limited to their evaluation and benchmarking, is the third aim of the proposed workshop.

Effects of Automation on Traffic: Data-driven predictions can end up being implicitly conditioned on second-order effects. For example, seeing a recording vehicle or no driver in an autonomous car can influence traffic participant’s decisions. Fixed settings in automated functions, such as safe distances, can influence the traffic flow on highways. While this can potentially introduce a distribution shift for prediction algorithms it could be also leveraged to purposefully shape traffic. We invite therefore also approaches investigating these second-order effects, propagating in highly interactive scenarios.

Preliminary Agenda

{% include schedule %}

Organizers

{% include feature_row id="organizers_row" %}

Please get in touch with [email protected] or any of the organizers in case you have any further questions.

Past Editions

At IV2023, the organizers hosted the latest edition of this workshop: https://kit-mrt.github.io/iv2023-workshop/.