Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pos_lot_selection - v15 - POS Picking Type's Location is Not Considering #1166

Open
NilmarShereef opened this issue Mar 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically.

Comments

@NilmarShereef
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem?
If so, please provide clear and concise description of what the problem is.

In case of multi POS sessions, Each POS will have a picking type and WAREHOUSE/LOCATION. In this case the module is showing all LOTS related to entire location, Not filtering based on picking type.

Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.
Need to add a domain of location ID in code, Then it will display only the lots in that particular location.

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Additional context
Add any other context about the feature request here.

Otherwise, POS Users will select wrong LOTs and which will lead to INVENTORY DIFFERENCES.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 8, 2024

There hasn't been any activity on this issue in the past 6 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days.
If you want this issue to never become stale, please ask a PSC member to apply the "no stale" label.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Sep 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant