Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

T1015 - Accessibility Features - Possible Fix to Current Hunt #28

Open
sahar55 opened this issue Jan 9, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

T1015 - Accessibility Features - Possible Fix to Current Hunt #28

sahar55 opened this issue Jan 9, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@sahar55
Copy link

sahar55 commented Jan 9, 2019

So I've been examining this hunt/detection and I have attempted to recreate the conditions for this hunt and while doing so I have encountered a possible incorrect logic presented in this hunt.
I may be wrong and if so I'd be happy to learn how to get the desired result.

TL: DR;
1.ParentImage OR ParentProcessName are not the Accessibility program (as suggested in the hunt), but rather the process "winlogon.exe"
2.ParentProcessName is not a field that exists in the event 4688 - "Creator Process Name" is, and only exists since Win10 according to this:
https://www.ultimatewindowssecurity.com/securitylog/encyclopedia/event.aspx?eventid=4688

What I used:

The scenario is this:
I used IFEO to set cmd.exe as a debugger to sethc.exe, then, I used the Sticky-Keys, and other methods to invoke sethc.exe and while reviewing the logs (both Evt and Sysmon) none of them contains the had sethc.exe as a parent of cmd.exe

In addition, if those accessibility features do have a debugger set to them, The analytic proposed shouldn't work since it won't execute the accessibility program.

Am I missing something?
If you need additional details I'd be happy to provide,
looking forward to your answer,
Sahar.

@sahar55 sahar55 changed the title T1015 - Accessibility Features - Possibly incorrect hunt T1015 - Accessibility Features - Possible Fix to Current Hunt Jan 16, 2019
@Cyb3rWard0g
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello @sahar55 ! We changed the format a little bit and cleaned some of the playbooks from before. I will add this as a new playbook since I believe the last one was removed while migrating from MD -> YAML -> Notebooks. Thank you for sharing this!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants