Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make the official OWL RL tests part of the project #14

Open
wrobell opened this issue Oct 13, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

Make the official OWL RL tests part of the project #14

wrobell opened this issue Oct 13, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@wrobell
Copy link
Contributor

wrobell commented Oct 13, 2018

The readme file states this version passes the full batch of official OWL Full/RL tests. It would be good to make the tests part of the project to make collaboration easier and more constructive.

@blokhin
Copy link

blokhin commented Oct 13, 2018

Artur, I believe that's this: https://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Full (namely, https://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Test_Suite_Status). However the overall state is quite sad (404 pages, not maintained etc.)

UPDATE found it:

https://arxiv.org/abs/1108.0155

The link to the original cade2011-schneidsut-owlfullatp.zip with the tests, mentioned in the article, is now dead, but luckily I downloaded it several years ago to my archives: https://yadi.sk/d/rwQwxMuYrJMMaQ

@wrobell
Copy link
Contributor Author

wrobell commented Oct 14, 2018

It seems like cade2011-schneidsut-owlfullatp/testdata/coverage/testsuite-owl2-rdfbased.zip contained in the above file is our starting point?

I do not see any license associated with the file, so I wonder if we can include it as part of the project?

@wrobell
Copy link
Contributor Author

wrobell commented Oct 15, 2018

Also http://owl.semanticweb.org/exports/approved/index.html

@nicholascar
Copy link
Member

I agree (as I said in your PR now approved) that we really do need the official test to actually know how the tool is performing in a comprehensive manner. I hope we can all start to outline the full set of tests first and then start chipping away at implementing them all soon. I may have more time to contribute over summer (Dec - Feb, here in Australia!),

@blokhin
Copy link

blokhin commented Feb 10, 2019

A series of the OWL Reasoner Evaluation workshops should be probably also mentioned here, namely:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants