You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A diagram in a category $$C$$ presents an instance of (copresheaf on) $$C$$ in either of the following equivalent ways:
By post-composing the diagram with the Yoneda embedding and taking the colimit of representables (see e.g. Kan extensions are partial colimits, Section 3)
By using the comprehensive factorization to factor the diagram as an initial functor followed by a discrete opfibration, then taking the latter
Constructing the category of elements (cf. #239) of (1) gives (2). In fact, this is how the nLab establishes the comprehensive factorization.
Generalizing from the case of the discrete double theory, we define a diagram in a model of a discrete double theory to be any model morphism into that model. The task is then to show how a diagram in a model presents an instance of the model. This could be accomplished by generalizing either/both of (1) and (2).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A diagram in a category$$C$$ presents an instance of (copresheaf on) $$C$$ in either of the following equivalent ways:
Constructing the category of elements (cf. #239) of (1) gives (2). In fact, this is how the nLab establishes the comprehensive factorization.
Generalizing from the case of the discrete double theory, we define a diagram in a model of a discrete double theory to be any model morphism into that model. The task is then to show how a diagram in a model presents an instance of the model. This could be accomplished by generalizing either/both of (1) and (2).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: