Lorem Ipsum

[xuanxu]

Submitting Author: JJ (@xuanxu)
Repository: github.com/xuanxu/reviewers
Version submitted: 5.0
Package name: Astropackage Test!

Editor: @gemgon
Reviewer 1: TBD
Reviewer 2: @gemgon
Archive: TBD
Version accepted: v1.4.0

Reviewers: @xuanxu

Due date: Due date for @gemgon: 2021-07-14
Due date for @xuanxu: 2021-07-19

---

Submission type: standard

Description

Lorem ipsum fugit nulla sint ea aspernatur. Repellat dolor consequatur optio nihil officiis dolorum. Quia aut maxime molestiae numquam sit nobis reprehenderit exercitationem.

Sed animi modi quia distinctio. Voluptatem laborum ipsum et earum deleniti vel harum dolor. Voluptate delectus nihil culpa laborum in porro. Velit ut dolor atque dolorem ratione. Ut odit inventore ut consequatur id. Nam nihil reprehenderit ratione dolor autem.

Review checklist for @xuanxu

Conflict of interest

• I confirm that I have no COIs with reviewing this work or that any perceived COIs have been waived by an editor for the purpose of this review.

Code of Conduct

• I confirm that I read and will adhere to the code of conduct.

General checks

• Repository: Is the source code for this software available at the repo url?
• License: Does the repository contain a plain-text LICENSE file with the contents of an OSI approved software license?
• Contribution and authorship: Has the submitting author (@xuanxu) made major contributions to the software?
• Substantial scholarly effort: Does this submission meet the scope eligibility?

Functionality

• Installation: Does installation proceed as outlined in the documentation?
• Functionality: Have the functional claims of the software been confirmed?
• Performance: If there are any performance claims of the software, have they been confirmed? (If there are no claims, please check off this item.)

Documentation

• A statement of need: Do the authors clearly state what problems the software is designed to solve and who the target audience is?
• Installation instructions: Is there a clearly-stated list of dependencies? Ideally these should be handled with an automated package management solution.
• Example usage: Do the authors include examples of how to use the software (ideally to solve real-world analysis problems).
• Functionality documentation: Is the core functionality of the software documented to a satisfactory level (e.g., API method documentation)?
• Automated tests: Are there automated tests or manual steps described so that the functionality of the software can be verified?
• Community guidelines: Are there clear guidelines for third parties wishing to 1) Contribute to the software 2) Report issues or problems with the software 3) Seek support

[botsci]

Welcome xuanxu, thanks for opening this issue 🎉

Thanks for sending your software to aliadalabs/sunnydale

[botsci]

The quality of the code in github.com/xuanxu/reviewers is not bad

[xuanxu]

@botsci help!

[botsci]

Hello @xuanxu, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@botsci help

# Show our community Code of Conduct and Guidelines
@botsci code of conduct

# List all current topic editors
@botsci list editors

# Assign a user as the reviewer N of this submission (where N=1,2...)
@botsci assign @username as reviewer 2

# Remove the user assigned as reviewer N of this submission (where N=1,2...)
@botsci remove reviewer 2

# Add to this issue's reviewers list
@botsci add @username to reviewers

# Remove from this issue's reviewers list
@botsci remove @username from reviewers

# Assign a user as the editor of this submission
@botsci assign @username as editor

# Remove the editor assigned to this submission
@botsci remove editor

# Send an invitation to a user to collaborate in the review
@botsci invite @username

# Add a user to this issue's assignees list
@botsci add assignee: @username

# Remove a user from this issue's assignees list
@botsci remove assignee: @username

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
# Optionally, it can be run on a non-default branch 
@botsci check references
@botsci check references from custom-branch-name

# Perform checks on the repository
# Optionally, it can be run on a non-default branch 
@botsci check repository
@botsci check repository from custom-branch-name

# Set a value for version
@botsci set v1.0.0 as version

# Set a value for archive
@botsci set 10.21105/joss.12345 as archive

# Label issue with: reviewed, recommend publication, pending publication. Remove labels: ongoing, pending review
@botsci review successful

# Label issue with: recommend rejection
@botsci review failed

# Close the issue
@botsci reject

# Reports on the quality of the code
@botsci analyze code

# Random facts about cats
@botsci tell me something about cats

# Add review checklist for a user
@botsci add checklist for @username

# Remove the checklist for a user
@botsci remove checklist for @username

[xuanxu]

@botsci analyze code

[botsci]

Inspecting code...

[botsci]

The quality of the code in github.com/xuanxu/reviewers is quite the best

[xuanxu]

@botsci tell me something about cats

[botsci]

Here is a random fact about cats:

😺😺 Используемое мобильное устройство:. 😸😸

[xuanxu]

@botsci help!

[botsci]

Hello @xuanxu, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@botsci help

# Show our community Code of Conduct and Guidelines
@botsci code of conduct

# List all current topic editors
@botsci list editors

# Assign a user as the reviewer N of this submission (where N=1,2...)
@botsci assign @username as reviewer 2

# Remove the user assigned as reviewer N of this submission (where N=1,2...)
@botsci remove reviewer 2

# Add to this issue's reviewers list
@botsci add @username to reviewers

# Remove from this issue's reviewers list
@botsci remove @username from reviewers

# Assign a user as the editor of this submission
@botsci assign @username as editor

# Remove the editor assigned to this submission
@botsci remove editor

# Send an invitation to a user to collaborate in the review
@botsci invite @username

# Add a user to this issue's assignees list
@botsci add assignee: @username

# Remove a user from this issue's assignees list
@botsci remove assignee: @username

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
# Optionally, it can be run on a non-default branch 
@botsci check references
@botsci check references from custom-branch-name

# Perform checks on the repository
# Optionally, it can be run on a non-default branch 
@botsci check repository
@botsci check repository from custom-branch-name

# Set a value for version
@botsci set v1.0.0 as version

# Set a value for archive
@botsci set 10.21105/joss.12345 as archive

# Label issue with: reviewed, recommend publication, pending publication. Remove labels: ongoing, pending review
@botsci review successful

# Label issue with: recommend rejection
@botsci review failed

# Close the issue
@botsci reject

# Reports on the quality of the code
@botsci analyze code

# Random facts about cats
@botsci tell me something about cats

# Add review checklist for a user
@botsci add checklist for @username

# Remove the checklist for a user
@botsci remove checklist for @username

[xuanxu]

@botsci add @invalid_user763188 to reviewers

[botsci]

I can't find the reviewers list

[xuanxu]

@botsci add @invalid_user763188 to reviewers

[botsci]

@invalid_user763188 added to the reviewers list!

[xuanxu]

@botsci add @gemgon to reviewers

[botsci]

@gemgon added to the reviewers list!

[xuanxu]

@botsci help!

[botsci]

Hello @xuanxu, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@botsci help

# Show our Code of Conduct
@botsci code of conduct

[xuanxu]

@botsci help!

[botsci]

Hello @xuanxu, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@botsci help

# Show our Code of Conduct
@botsci code of conduct

# Switch to "seeking reviewers"
@botsci seeking reviewers

# Approve the package
@botsci approve

# Add a user to this issue's reviewers list
@botsci add xxxxx to reviewers

# Remove a user from the reviewers list
@botsci remove xxxxx from reviewers

# Assign a user as the editor of this submission
@botsci assign @username as editor

# Remove the editor assigned to this submission
@botsci remove editor

# Close the issue
@botsci approve

# Close the issue
@botsci out of scope

# Various package checks
@botsci check package

[xuanxu]

@botsci add @invalid_user684593 to reviewers

[xuanxu]

@botsci add @invalid_user684593 to reviewers

[xuanxu]

@botsci add @invalid_user684593 to reviewers

[xuanxu]

@botsci add @xuanxu to reviewers

[xuanxu]

@botsci code of conduct

[botsci]

Our Code of Conduct can be found at https://ropensci.org

[xuanxu]

@botsci add @xuanxu from reviewers

[xuanxu]

@botsci remove @xuanxu to reviewers

[xuanxu]

@botsci assign @gemgon as editor

[xuanxu]

@botsci add @xuanxu to reviewers

[botsci]

@xuanxu added to the reviewers list. Review due date is 2021-07-19. Thanks @xuanxu for accepting to review! Please refer to our reviewer guide.

[botsci]

@xuanxu: If you haven't done so, please fill this form for us to update our reviewers records.

[xuanxu]

@botsci help

[botsci]

Hello @xuanxu, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@botsci help

# Show our community Code of Conduct and Guidelines
@botsci code of conduct

# List all current topic editors
@botsci list editors

# Assign a user as the reviewer N of this submission (where N=1,2...)
@botsci assign @username as reviewer 2

# Remove the user assigned as reviewer N of this submission (where N=1,2...)
@botsci remove reviewer 2

# Add to this issue's reviewers list
@botsci add @username to reviewers

# Remove from this issue's reviewers list
@botsci remove @username from reviewers

# Assign a user as the editor of this submission
@botsci assign @username as editor

# Remove the editor assigned to this submission
@botsci remove editor

# Send an invitation to a user to collaborate in the review
@botsci invite @username

# Add a user to this issue's assignees list
@botsci add assignee: @username

# Remove a user from this issue's assignees list
@botsci remove assignee: @username

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
# Optionally, it can be run on a non-default branch 
@botsci check references
@botsci check references from custom-branch-name

# Perform checks on the repository
# Optionally, it can be run on a non-default branch 
@botsci check repository
@botsci check repository from custom-branch-name

# Set a value for version
@botsci set v1.0.0 as version

# Set a value for archive
@botsci set 10.21105/joss.12345 as archive

# Label issue with: reviewed, recommend publication, pending publication. Remove labels: ongoing, pending review
@botsci review successful

# Label issue with: recommend rejection
@botsci review failed

# Close the issue
@botsci reject

# Reports on the quality of the code
@botsci analyze code

# Random facts about cats
@botsci tell me something about cats

# Add review checklist for a user
@botsci add checklist for @username

# Remove the checklist for a user
@botsci remove checklist for @username

[xuanxu]

@botsci analyze code

[botsci]

Inspecting code...

[botsci]

The quality of the code in github.com/xuanxu/reviewers is quite the best

[xuanxu]

@botsci set v1.4.0 as version

[botsci]

Done! version is now v1.4.0

[xuanxu]

@botsci add assignee: @gemgon

[botsci]

@gemgon lacks permissions to be an assignee.

[xuanxu]

@botsci add assignee: @xuanxu

[botsci]

@xuanxu added as assignee.

[xuanxu]

@botsci remove @gemgon from reviewers

[botsci]

@gemgon removed from the reviewers list!

[xuanxu]

@botsci assign @gemgon as reviewer 1

[botsci]

Reviewer 1 assigned!

[xuanxu]

@botsci remove reviewer 1

[botsci]

Reviewer 1 removed!

[xuanxu]

@botsci assign @gemgon as reviewer 2

[botsci]

Reviewer 2 assigned!

[xuanxu]

@botsci remove assignee: @xuanxu

[botsci]

@xuanxu removed from assignees.

[xuanxu]

@botsci add checklist for @xuanxu

[botsci]

Checklist added for @xuanxu