Thought - node scores are a bit ambiguous

[keyserj]

Node scores can be understood a few different ways, and this can cause confusion about how to use or interpret them. Thoughts:

• possible meanings of a high score
  • "I agree" - this seems implied by the color matching with support/critique + thumbs-up/-down representing these
  • "I think this is important" - I usually emphasize this as the meaning verbally/in docs
  • "I want to talk about this" - can be conflated with "important", seems useful to be able to convey
  • "I think this is good" - slightly different from the others, but I've also said "high = generally good"
• possible improvements (topic https://ameliorate.app/keyserj/ameliorate-scores-UX)
  • keep one ambiguous score - maybe other things could reduce ambiguity while keeping only one kind of score
  • separate scores per meaning - would be nice but hard to keep UX from being overwhelming/cluttered
  • make score mean "important" - disallows concise communication of the other kinds of feelings
  • make score mean "agree" - disallows concise communication of the other kinds of feelings
  • remove scores - disallows concise communication of any kinds of feelings
  • separate score for import vs truth confidence, separate indicator for "want discuss"
    • two scores might be manageable
    • don't need score for "want to discuss" - this can be a temporary mark
    • "good" seems like it could be "important" instead
    • might still have ambiguity
      • does "I think this is a detriment" have overlapping justification with "I think this detriment is important to address"?