Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Roadmap discussion #1

Open
carlitux opened this issue Oct 27, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Roadmap discussion #1

carlitux opened this issue Oct 27, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@carlitux
Copy link

  • Interface like denite, would be good to replicate most of it's ideas.
  • Interface like deoplete, would be good to replicate most of it's ideas.
  • Plugin system to search previous point plugins and global plugins like vscode.

Please let us know your ideas, roadmap to get help.

@andreypopp
Copy link
Member

Hi @carlitux, thanks for opening this issue!

This project in its super early stages — even don’t use it 100% of the time currently because of bugs and UX annoyances. Hopefully that would change soon as I’m making progress on fixing those issues along the way.

Interface like denite, would be good to replicate most of it's ideas.

That would be great, I haven’t thought much about the API though. I also don’t use denite but use fzf instead — which more limited than denite, I think.

Interface like deoplete, would be good to replicate most of it's ideas.

I definitely want to tackle completion but wanted to keep it limited to LSP + keyword completion.

Plugin system to search previous point plugins and global plugins like vscode.

Can you elaborate what do you mean by this?

@andreypopp andreypopp changed the title Feature requests Roadmap discussion Oct 27, 2019
@carlitux
Copy link
Author

This project in its super early stages — even don’t use it 100% of the time currently because of bugs and UX annoyances. Hopefully that would change soon as I’m making progress on fixing those issues along the way.

Yes, of course. I will add this in my config and I'd like to contribute this.

I definitely want to tackle completion but wanted to keep it limited to LSP + keyword completion.

I'd suggest to enable other source as external, LSP is good but sometimes isn't enough. As I understood this will rely on builtin LSP integration we can improve many things.

Can you elaborate what do you mean by this?

I was just thinking mode could have a plugin system that can query github/gitlab and suggest packages based on programming languages.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants