Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How much consideration is given to soft affinity for consolidation? #7133

Open
rskmm0chang opened this issue Oct 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation needs-triage Issues that need to be triaged

Comments

@rskmm0chang
Copy link

Description

I have read document consolidation, but there is something I would like to ask about.

In the process of node consolidation, should the controller focus on minimizing costs or balance cost reduction with maximizing the satisfaction of preferredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution constraints?

Consolidation is designed to group nodes to achieve the lowest possible cost. However, the level of consideration given to preferredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution is less clear. While requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution mandates strict adherence during consolidation, preferredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution only represents a preference and is not strictly enforced.

@rskmm0chang rskmm0chang added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation needs-triage Issues that need to be triaged labels Oct 1, 2024
@rskmm0chang rskmm0chang changed the title How much consideration is given to soft affinity during 'consolidation'? How much consideration is given to soft affinity for consolidation? Oct 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation needs-triage Issues that need to be triaged
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant