You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
ncbi-blast+ has been recently upgraded to version 2.16.0 in Debian sid, and from my current analysis, this seems to have triggered Debian bug #1077454. Relevant part of the error looks like:
# DB and mask make tests
# Failed test 'right type'
# at t/SABlastPlus.t line 37.
# got: undef
# expected: 'nucl'
# Failed test 'correct type'
# at t/SABlastPlus.t line 53.
# got: undef
# expected: 'nucl'
------------- EXCEPTION -------------
MSG: Masker 'windowmasker' can't use a blastdb as primary input
STACK Bio::Tools::Run::StandAloneBlastPlus::make_mask /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/blib/lib/Bio/Tools/Run/StandAloneBlastPlus.pm:818
STACK toplevel t/SABlastPlus.t:55
-------------------------------------
# Looks like your test exited with 29 just after 14.
t/SABlastPlus.t ...............
1..71
ok 1 - use Bio::Tools::Run::StandAloneBlastPlus;
ok 2 - use Bio::Tools::Run::WrapperBase;
ok 3 - use Bio::Tools::Run::WrapperBase::CommandExts;
ok 4 - BlastPlus factory
ok 5 - make factory
ok 6 - test db made with fasta
ok 7 - temp db
not ok 8 - right type
ok 9
ok 10 - named db made
ok 11 - check_db
ok 12 - correct name
ok 13 - dbinfo hash returned
not ok 14 - correct type
Dubious, test returned 29 (wstat 7424, 0x1d00)
Failed 59/71 subtests
I don't exclude we might actually hit problems with the newer makeblastdb, but for the moment my impression tends to be that the test may need adjustments to the new ncbi-blast+ revision.
Have a nice day, :)
Étienne.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
ncbi-blast+ has been recently upgraded to version 2.16.0 in Debian sid, and from my current analysis, this seems to have triggered Debian bug #1077454. Relevant part of the error looks like:
I don't exclude we might actually hit problems with the newer makeblastdb, but for the moment my impression tends to be that the test may need adjustments to the new ncbi-blast+ revision.
Have a nice day, :)
Étienne.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: