You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Charging fees for placing bounties may or may not affect the number of bounties people place, but it certainly does not cause people to place more bounties.
Bounty Source has a lot of growth potential. Github has 3 million users. Freelancer.com reports 9 million users. With only 10,000 users I think BS could easily expand by a factor of 10 or even 100. Right now I think growth should be the first priority rather than turning a profit. It wouldn't be a bad idea operate at a loss in order to do promotions that encourage people to place more bounties (e.g. place two bounties and get 5$ added to your next bounty).
Bounty Source doesn't need to charge fees to make money. If there is always at least one bounty going, Bounty Source will always have a reserve of money available to it. The more bounties that are on the site, the deeper the reserve will become. There will be some level that the reserve will be extremely unlikely to dip below unless there is some unforeseen event that causes people to stop placing bounties en masse. Bounty Source can invest the money from the reserve (up to a "safe" level that it doesn't dip below) and make a profit from the returns. This is similar to what banks do when they loan out the money people put in their savings accounts.
Want to back this issue? Place a bounty on it! We accept bounties via Bountysource.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: