We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
There is no need for our arbitraries to require non-readonly options. They should be ok with receiving readonly versions of their constraints.
Needed for next major! Probably acceptable for current minor too!
More details on frozen, sealed... at https://www.codecademy.com/resources/docs/javascript/objects/isFrozen.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
constant
No branches or pull requests
🚀 Feature Request
Motivation
There is no need for our arbitraries to require non-readonly options. They should be ok with receiving readonly versions of their constraints.
Needed for next major! Probably acceptable for current minor too!
More details on frozen, sealed... at https://www.codecademy.com/resources/docs/javascript/objects/isFrozen.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: