You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, could you explain how reliable CNVkit is for somatic CNV calling in case of "germline" CNVs?
We sequenced a cancer cell line before and after engraftment into mice. I ran CNVkit with the nf-core/sarek pipeline.
When looking at the results for the baseline sample, CNVkit shows a locus with 5 copies at baseline (~2.4M bp).
We are interested in additional CNVs that happened/were selected for during engraftment, i.e. further amplification or loss.
The results of CNVkit and the PURPLE tool (run as part of nf-core/oncoanalyser pipeline) are quite different: CNVkit estimates a somatic CN change of 1.38 (cn=3, log2=0.456329) at the locus. The CN estimated by purple is 2.03.
Below a scatter plot of chr12 for the baseline sample
And for the tumor sample using the baseline as reference
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, could you explain how reliable CNVkit is for somatic CNV calling in case of "germline" CNVs?
We sequenced a cancer cell line before and after engraftment into mice. I ran CNVkit with the nf-core/sarek pipeline.
When looking at the results for the baseline sample, CNVkit shows a locus with 5 copies at baseline (~2.4M bp).
We are interested in additional CNVs that happened/were selected for during engraftment, i.e. further amplification or loss.
The results of CNVkit and the PURPLE tool (run as part of nf-core/oncoanalyser pipeline) are quite different: CNVkit estimates a somatic CN change of 1.38 (cn=3, log2=0.456329) at the locus. The CN estimated by purple is 2.03.
Below a scatter plot of chr12 for the baseline sample
And for the tumor sample using the baseline as reference
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: