You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Sorry for the license issue here. During packaging ufoLib2 into Debian, we have to strip out Ubuntu font used in the test cases. It is considered not a free software license in Debian (not DFSG-free) since it has issues about naming restrictions. (Forcing derivative works to use "Ubuntu derivative X" on font name, instead of prevent from using designated name like Reserved Font Name in SIL OFL, where latter is allowed in DFSG to prevent trademark issues.)
Could you replace test case ufo to those covered by SIL OFL or other fonts which is considered by most organizations as a FOSS license, unless Ubuntu font is related in a test case?
Sorry for the license issue here. During packaging ufoLib2 into Debian, we have to strip out Ubuntu font used in the test cases. It is considered not a free software license in Debian (not DFSG-free) since it has issues about naming restrictions. (Forcing derivative works to use "Ubuntu derivative X" on font name, instead of prevent from using designated name like Reserved Font Name in SIL OFL, where latter is allowed in DFSG to prevent trademark issues.)
Could you replace test case ufo to those covered by SIL OFL or other fonts which is considered by most organizations as a FOSS license, unless Ubuntu font is related in a test case?
Source:
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/2011-April/006515.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: