You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Expected: "could not find implicit value..."
Actual: No implicit Ordering defined for BigDecimal.
We have trait Adjacent[T] extends Ordering[T].
It is a bit confusing to see that message because implicitly[Ordering[BigDecimal]] exists.
We could include the type that is actually required in the message. Maybe also emit a warning when compiling Adjacent to suggest adding an @implicitNotFound? cc @som-snytt
The Scala PR moves the parent annotation text to the end of the message, so that the test just works again after the fix. It tests a prefix of the message.
this came up in the Scala 2.13 community build. after scala/community-build@54060a2 , refined started failing with:
the problem is reproducible outside dbuild just with
++2.13.1-bin-c5eed1d
(after adding a resolver) followed bycoreJVM/Test/compile
looking at
git log --merges 63f89ba..c5eed1d
, it seems likely the cause is scala/scala#8072@lrytz @fthomas does this seem like a progression to you, and not a regression?
in the community build, I can work around it by temporarily excluding
AdjacentSpec.scala
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: