Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discussion: earthquake cycle modeling implementation #693

Open
baagaard-usgs opened this issue Apr 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Discussion: earthquake cycle modeling implementation #693

baagaard-usgs opened this issue Apr 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
design At design stage

Comments

@baagaard-usgs
Copy link
Contributor

Possible setup options

Coupling of quasistatic and dynamic boundary value problems

Switch between quasistatic and dynamic boundary value problems, resolving interseismic deformation with the quasistatic problem and the coseismic deformation with the dynamic problem.

Two-level scheme

The fine level has the dynamic model and the coarse level has the quasi-static model. The purpose of the fine level model is to correct the coarse level operator (with more precise stresses near faults), making accurate long-term integration feasible. This is the same idea as having a kinetic (particle) fine model and a continuum coarse model (ike we think about in plasma physics).

@baagaard-usgs baagaard-usgs added the design At design stage label Apr 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
design At design stage
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant