Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why is "with a disability" better than "disabled"? #291

Open
zorae opened this issue Jul 23, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Why is "with a disability" better than "disabled"? #291

zorae opened this issue Jul 23, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@zorae
Copy link

zorae commented Jul 23, 2020

Alex flags any instance of "disabled" and suggests "with a disability" instead. What is the reasoning behind this?

I am aware that some disability advocates have discouraged use of "disabled", but this is far from consensus. Other lists of ableist language don't flag "disabled" and I've personally met more people who describe themselves as "disabled" than who prefer "person with a disability".

@wooorm
Copy link
Member

wooorm commented Aug 23, 2020

You are correct! It depends. The lists I based the original entries on at the start, preferred people-first language. I think alex should have more options, such as in this case, where it allows either people- or identity-first language.

However, that also has problems. E.g., people with AIDS historically fought for person-first language. But other groups, such as in the Blind, are serious about identity-first. So it shouldn’t all be an option.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants