Umbrel needs to support HTTPS (this is important)

[mikropsoft]

I want to expose Umbrel to the external network, but when I do so with a domain that has an SSL certificate, I receive a warning similar to the one I mentioned in issue #1832.

Opening Umbrel on the external network via HTTP doesn’t inspire confidence. This support should be implemented urgently. I kindly ask all developers to take this into consideration.

[GuiSousa135]

I agree, this is extremely important, but I don't know if it is easy to implement.

[JoseMoranUrena523]

You’d have to wait on the Umbrel developers to decide whether they want to implement HTTPS support.

[JoseMoranUrena523]

I agree, this is extremely important, but I don't know if it is easy to implement.

I assume what they'd have to do is use certbot to generate an SSL, and have whatever they use (say nginx) be able to use that SSL.

[kennym]

Is this really a security issue if you're accessing your Umbrel without https via tailscale? Isn't the traffic between you and Umbrel always encrypted as long as connected to Tailscale?

[JoseMoranUrena523]

Is this really a security issue if you're accessing your Umbrel without https via tailscale? Isn't the traffic between you and Umbrel always encrypted as long as connected to Tailscale?

I don't think its a major security issue with Tailscale, but still. What if you don't want to use Tailscale?