You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I tried GaAs example. I found that the experiment's intrinsic carrier concentration is just 1.7e6. But if I reduce the doping concentration to 1.7e6, the following error appears. Is the method not suitable for low doping content or semiconductors?
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "~/miniconda3/lib/python3.9/site-packages/amset/core/data.py", line 219, in
set_doping_and_temperatures
) = self.dos.get_fermi(
File "~/miniconda3/lib/python3.9/site-packages/amset/electronic_structure/dos.py", line 224, in get_fermi raise ValueError(
ValueError: Could not find fermi within 100.0% of
concentration=2.652506335351714e-19
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I thought about a low doping concentration because if I set the doping concentration of -3e13, the obtained average electronic conductivity is very much higher compared with the experimental one (1e-6 to 1e-8 /ohm cm). I got information from GaAs: "Intrinsic Carrier Concentration | 1.79 x 106 cm-3". I also found a higher doping concentration in another document (1e13~1e14), but don't know the reasonable one. Maybe a range of doping concentrations is needed. Is the accuracy of electronic conductivity reasonable?
I tried GaAs example. I found that the experiment's intrinsic carrier concentration is just 1.7e6. But if I reduce the doping concentration to 1.7e6, the following error appears. Is the method not suitable for low doping content or semiconductors?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: