Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ValueError: Could not find fermi within low concentration #852

Open
thienbinh92 opened this issue Feb 17, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

ValueError: Could not find fermi within low concentration #852

thienbinh92 opened this issue Feb 17, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@thienbinh92
Copy link

I tried GaAs example. I found that the experiment's intrinsic carrier concentration is just 1.7e6. But if I reduce the doping concentration to 1.7e6, the following error appears. Is the method not suitable for low doping content or semiconductors?

  Traceback (most recent call last):
    File "~/miniconda3/lib/python3.9/site-packages/amset/core/data.py", line 219, in 
  set_doping_and_temperatures
   ) = self.dos.get_fermi(
    File "~/miniconda3/lib/python3.9/site-packages/amset/electronic_structure/dos.py", line 224, in get_fermi raise ValueError(

  ValueError: Could not find fermi within 100.0% of 
  concentration=2.652506335351714e-19
@utf
Copy link
Member

utf commented Feb 17, 2024

I have never heard of carrier concentrations that low before. For GaAs you typically see concentrations from 1e13 and above.

Could there be a mistake with your units? The concentration should be in cm^-3.

@thienbinh92
Copy link
Author

thienbinh92 commented Feb 18, 2024

I thought about a low doping concentration because if I set the doping concentration of -3e13, the obtained average electronic conductivity is very much higher compared with the experimental one (1e-6 to 1e-8 /ohm cm). I got information from GaAs: "Intrinsic Carrier Concentration | 1.79 x 106 cm-3". I also found a higher doping concentration in another document (1e13~1e14), but don't know the reasonable one. Maybe a range of doping concentrations is needed. Is the accuracy of electronic conductivity reasonable?

  Average conductivity (σ), Seebeck (S) and mobility (μ) results:

    conc [cm-3]    temp [K]    σ [S/m]    S [µV/K]    μ [cm2/Vs]
  -------------  ----------  ---------  ----------  ------------
      -3.00e+13       201.0   1.72e+01   -8.56e+02       35825.3
      -3.00e+13       290.0   7.78e+00   -9.11e+02       16187.2
      -3.00e+13       401.0   4.18e+00   -9.67e+02        8705.5
      -3.00e+13       506.0   2.81e+00   -1.01e+03        5836.5
      -3.00e+13       605.0   2.81e+00   -9.84e+02        4387.0
      -3.00e+13       789.0   3.10e+01   -7.11e+02        2906.5
      -3.00e+13       994.0   2.40e+02   -5.45e+02        1989.5

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants