You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It has been brought up multiple times already (e.g. in #10 ) that it would be extremely useful to support namespaces for function and parameter names.
From what I can see, many people would like a syntax like namespace::name, which I personally also like (coming from the C++-world).
I think we should not enforce the usage of a namespace, but rather allow tooling to, upon import, append a namespace to all names in a specific file, which will make combinations much more explicit.
One important point here is if we want to support nested namespaces.
It has been brought up multiple times already (e.g. in #10 ) that it would be extremely useful to support namespaces for function and parameter names.
From what I can see, many people would like a syntax like
namespace::name
, which I personally also like (coming from the C++-world).I think we should not enforce the usage of a namespace, but rather allow tooling to, upon import, append a namespace to all names in a specific file, which will make combinations much more explicit.
One important point here is if we want to support nested namespaces.
This has some interplay with #12 .
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: