We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In the book, we have so many theorems and properties defined, which cannot be formally proved by Haskell or C++.
Is it a good Idea if we use proof assistants to prove these theorems, for example Coq, Idris or Agda ...?
BTW, I have started a project to interpret the book "conceptual mathematics" in Coq when learning category theory: https://github.com/HaoYang670/conceptual_mathematics
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
In the book, we have so many theorems and properties defined, which cannot be formally proved by Haskell or C++.
Is it a good Idea if we use proof assistants to prove these theorems, for example Coq, Idris or Agda ...?
BTW, I have started a project to interpret the book "conceptual mathematics" in Coq when learning category theory: https://github.com/HaoYang670/conceptual_mathematics
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: