Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

See if we can generate Haxe getters/setters #5

Open
jeremyfa opened this issue Oct 16, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

See if we can generate Haxe getters/setters #5

jeremyfa opened this issue Oct 16, 2017 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@jeremyfa
Copy link
Owner

jeremyfa commented Oct 16, 2017

It would be nice to get rid of java-style getVar() setVar() accessors as Haxe can handle properties with custom getters and setters.

That said we would still want to keep the java style accessor available to keep parity with official runtime (but make them totally optional) and ensure converted code doesn't call a getter/setter when it expect to access the underlying variable directly.

@jeremyfa jeremyfa self-assigned this Oct 16, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant