When appeal is starting allow some time to assess and submit new evidence (do not start the appeal ASAP)

[marsrobertson]

There should be time to submit evidence.

Otherwise, it creates the following situation:

• there is a ruling
• I'm unsure if the appeal is coming
• I need to proactively assess and submit new evidence

Another rationalte could be - jurors need to "meditate" on evidence for 48 hours.

Do not allow to vote ASAP.

Ensuring enough time to assess the evidence.

Creating an issue as suggested here.

[marczeller]

I'm not convinced that's useful,

The Kleros Protocol should have minimal control on jurors, and the act of vote "early" means increased risk for the same expected outcome.
The early voter is exposed to miss crucial pieces of evidence.

Some may think that tools such as Kleroscan.com can be leveraged by early voting to influence jurors.
But i believe that after a few months of production-stage dispute resolution, we can safely say that Kleros is resilient to these "attacks."