You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I don't know why this test sends 2 remove address, each time followed by the removal of the subflow: this hid the bug. I suggest removing only one subflow, not the two of them. @geliangtang: WDYT?
We are certainly missing some actions when a subflow is removed, e.g. retry if we are under the limit, etc.
It looks like the subflow counter is not updated when the other end initiates the removal of a subflow, e.g. after having received a RM_ADDR:
We get the following errors:
The counter should be the same on each side.
I don't know why this test sends 2 remove address, each time followed by the removal of the subflow: this hid the bug. I suggest removing only one subflow, not the two of them. @geliangtang: WDYT?
We are certainly missing some actions when a subflow is removed, e.g. retry if we are under the limit, etc.
(Note: I modified the test to validate https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/patch/[email protected]/ : this patch is needed not to have errors with
chk_rm_nr 2 0 invert
)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: