-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 96
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Drop IE8 support #46
Comments
I understand your concerns. But the version with Creating a lightweight version of Assuming you're using browserify, as a workaround, you can replace |
I wouldnt mind moving IE8 support to a seperate module maybe |
I got to use xhr for the same reason (of small size) in the first place. |
-1 for dropping IE8 support entirely. I'm currently using xhr in a project that will have to support IE8 for at least another year, maybe longer. I'm also using xhr in arangodbjs, which works fine with IE8 otherwise. Also, IMO +1 for |
I'm interested in this split, too. @naugtur I've tried to use the
But I still see the I understand that this is not the ideal venue to address a question like this --- but I thought that since you brought up the solution here, maybe you would have a quick response that would be useful to others who run across this issue and try that solution. If not, I'll look elsewhere to figure out what I'm doing wrong. Thanks. |
It should work. I'd need to get a copy of your code to be able to help. |
It won't work. Browserify considers the |
It should be removed by now. Microsoft only give out support for ie 11 |
Don't worry, we are aware of what's happening in the browser world. Did you mean to say anything other than letting us know? |
10/10 issue management. would give ownership to @naugtur again. |
stalebot-ing myself. |
The code is on a branch. It'll get in as soon as other breaking changes for next major are implemented, but this got put on hold a few months ago as my daughter was born and other contributors weren't too active either. I'll get back to it eventually. Feel free to take a look at #81 to help push it forward |
I know, I know, it was just added :) But still - I'm raising this issue to at least get an official "no" - or maybe someone has a more concrete idea on how to decouple IE8 support / inject the header parsing function?
IE8 support depends on
parse-headers
, which is an extra 1.5kb browserified+minified. I'm using xhr itself exactly because it is small - ~2kb browserified+minified, so IE8 support effectively doubles the size. Some might say that's not much, but over here we have to save every byte (building a script for 3rd party sites...). Plus IE8 is not a Real Browser™ anyways.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: