Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: allow directory paths for LongFastQ input #151

Open
watsonar opened this issue Jul 9, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Feature request: allow directory paths for LongFastQ input #151

watsonar opened this issue Jul 9, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@watsonar
Copy link

watsonar commented Jul 9, 2024

Description of feature

Many labs doing ONT sequencing generate basecalled/demultiplexed FASTQ output split into multiple files in the same directory (this is in fact the default behavior of MinKNOW software). Would it be possible to add a feature where a path to a directory can be provided for the LongFastQ input, and all fastq files within that directory concatenated and used as workflow input? I'd be happy to work on implementing this if it fits with the developers' vision.

Thanks for your consideration!
Andrea

@watsonar watsonar added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 9, 2024
@d4straub
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi there, I do not oppose the addition but I do want to share my experience: Folder structures are changing over time and deviate between labs, therefore, code that parses your folder structure wont fit that of many others. Some output comes e.g. with failed and passed fastq files, so it seems not feasible in that cases to just concatenate all reads.

@Daniel-VM
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @watsonar! Thanks for your suggestion. I think the idea is great but, as @d4straub mentioned, it comes with some challenges that might place it out of the scope of the current version of nf-core/bacass 🤔 .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants