Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: decouple memote history from the git history #715

Open
1 task done
mihai-sysbio opened this issue Apr 11, 2021 · 2 comments
Open
1 task done

feat: decouple memote history from the git history #715

mihai-sysbio opened this issue Apr 11, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@mihai-sysbio
Copy link

Checklist

Is your feature related to a problem? Please describe it.

I want to be able to run memote on a series of model versions that I get to choose.

Describe the solution you would like.

For new users, I would like to show a history report only on the major releases of a model (potentially truncated to latest relevant ones).
For the community, I would like to show a history report of the major and minor releases of a model.
For the developers, I would like to show a history report of the last X releases including their latest changes on eg their new branch.
Another scenario is when a website (eg MetabolicAtlas) or standard (eg standard-GEM) would want to run the history report for a model for a few selected versions.

In other words, as a user of memote, I would like to be able to decide what the history report runs on. Morever, the more control I can be given over the report (ie format) the easier I can plug that into eg own databases or PR comments.

Describe alternatives you considered

The only alternative I found is either to run memote individually and piece together the history myself.
A git interval was suggested, but that only takes care of a start and end hash, without affecting the granularity.

Additional context

As described in #498, the history report can easily become overwhelming/noisy. Another issue it could trigger is #389.

@Midnighter
Copy link
Member

Great, thank you for the description @mihai-sysbio. Could you say something about how you would expect to provide this information? It seems a bit intricate just for command line arguments so maybe a config file? A file is less flexible, though. I'm curious what your thoughts are.

@mihai-sysbio
Copy link
Author

Could you say something about how you would expect to provide this information? It seems a bit intricate just for command line arguments so maybe a config file?

What I am imagining is either a comma-separated list of commit hashes or tags, or a file with one such git reference per line (much more simple than a proper config).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants