Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Profiles-based audit for bussiness models #42

Closed
dmknght opened this issue Apr 24, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Profiles-based audit for bussiness models #42

dmknght opened this issue Apr 24, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@dmknght
Copy link

dmknght commented Apr 24, 2020

I have an idea that this script can use for audit / hardening server base on profiles that use defined. For example, for file server:

  1. User defines which is allowed on file share server. Basic profile can be something like:
  • net.allow 445
  • service.allow samba
  • service.alert vnc
  1. When in audit mode, script can have 3 levels:
  • alert: something suspicious or is defined as alert in profile
  • warning: it isn't defined as allow and it is unknown data / service / port /...
  • allow: it is defined as allow
    So, with this custom profile syntax, admins can define rules for their servers and remove / block unsafe stuff easier.
    It should be also works for end-users with something like check firewall rules, ....
    What do you think about this idea?
@carlospolop
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @dmknght,

That idea is awesome but also very time consuming. Therefore I won't be able to do it in a near/medium future. If you want to try to do it yourself we can talk about how to do it. If not I will probably close this issue an reopen if whenever I try to do something similar.
Let me know your thought.

@carlospolop carlospolop added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 24, 2020
@dmknght
Copy link
Author

dmknght commented Apr 24, 2020

How about we keep this issue and do it later?

@carlospolop
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the idea mate, but I don't consider this to be a top priority feature so it will be tracked here: #43
Also, remember that if you would like to create the proposed idea, feel free to submit a pull request

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants