Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

errors in prediction #53

Open
richardm47 opened this issue Sep 14, 2017 · 5 comments
Open

errors in prediction #53

richardm47 opened this issue Sep 14, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@richardm47
Copy link

  1. Trained the software on different voices.
  2. Each voice sample used for training is length at least one minute long.
  3. For each voice a separate .out model file is created.

Now I matched new sample files each of length 5 seconds and the predictions were very random. Sometimes they were accurate and other times they showed wrong results. Even testing voices that weren't in the database showed a close match. Can you tell me what I am doing wrong ? And whats the correct way to feed background noise and how much does it matter ?

Note: I edited the /testbench/gmmset.py file to get scores and the scores came around -5 ~ -10 for wrong matches.

@richardm47
Copy link
Author

@ppwwyyxx ??

@ppwwyyxx
Copy link
Owner

For each voice a separate .out model file is created.

Why is this?

@richardm47
Copy link
Author

richardm47 commented Sep 16, 2017

@ppwwyyxx I need to update target speakers on a regular basis and selectively check for certain speakers only and not all the speakers. So I figured that it would be better to train one .out file for each speaker and call only the needed speaker's models while prediction. I am also getting output scores in the testbench/gmmset.py because the default system only shows the highest score and I've noticed that sometimes the other top scorers is the actual speaker. Their score is pretty high but not the highest.

What am I doing wrong ?

@richardm47
Copy link
Author

@ppwwyyxx is that wrong ?

@ppwwyyxx
Copy link
Owner

ppwwyyxx commented Oct 7, 2017

This looks right. I don't know what part was going wrong.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants