Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about has_online_content_ssim indexing rule #1558

Open
elohanlon opened this issue Sep 3, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Question about has_online_content_ssim indexing rule #1558

elohanlon opened this issue Sep 3, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@elohanlon
Copy link

elohanlon commented Sep 3, 2024

Hello,

Just writing in with a question. While working on our Arclight app, we noticed that Arclight currently uses an "_ssim" field for something that appears to index a single boolean value (wrapped in an array):

https://github.com/projectblacklight/arclight/blob/a49ae6af6739f79844f067067552b9fd32198ad3/lib/arclight/traject/ead2_component_config.rb#L210

Is _ssim is preferred by the Arclight maintainers in cases like this, rather than something like a _bsi ("boolean stored int") field? Although there isn't currently a _bsi field defined in the example solr schema.xml file (https://github.com/projectblacklight/arclight/blob/a8dc92f7b0c852bdef7f5ab838c97aec6c75c1bc/solr/conf/schema.xml), one could be added.

We have a similar indexing case for another field, so I thought it would be good to ask this here, in case there are any advantages to _ssim that I hadn't thought of.

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant