-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
content提取方式的比较? #16
Comments
还有个疑问:
这部分代码提取的第9层的信息,又经过了final_proj的结构,这样是bug还是有意为之?我的理解是最后一层经过它才是合理的 |
我个人倾向于第 9 层是故意的, 但是 final proj 是不小心的... |
根据 content vec 原作者的信息, |
So, does officail svc-develop-team have any plan to fix this usage of content vec? |
Fix when? pls |
|
Sorry I'm a bit confused. What do i need to do with that to apply the fix to so-vits-svc? |
This is fixed in https://github.com/34j/so-vits-svc-fork. Check out this issue: voicepaw/so-vits-svc-fork#213 in utils.py. get_hubert_content https://github.com/svc-develop-team/so-vits-svc/blob/4.0/utils.py#L225
I haven't tried yet. |
Alright, I'll try. thanks! |
@Likkkez refer this options -> https://github.com/yxlllc/DDSP-SVC/blob/master/ddsp/vocoder.py#L114 |
A ye thanks! I think now theres also a branch here that does the same thing right? The '4.0-Vec768-Layer12'. |
您好,这个项目做的很好。
我看你用了第九层的hubert,出于什么考虑呢?如何权衡内容信息丢失、音色泄漏的问题,您有对比过其他层或者whisper这种方式吗?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: