Add alternative to drag and drop for sorting #14525
Replies: 3 comments
-
Hi there @plannero! Firstly, a big thank you for raising this issue. Every piece of feedback we receive helps us to make Umbraco better. We really appreciate your patience while we wait for our team to have a look at this but we wanted to let you know that we see this and share with you the plan for what comes next.
We wish we could work with everyone directly and assess your issue immediately but we're in the fortunate position of having lots of contributions to work with and only a few humans who are able to do it. We are making progress though and in the meantime, we will keep you in the loop and let you know when we have any questions. Thanks, from your friendly Umbraco GitHub bot 🤖 🙂 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks a lot for raising this concern @plannero 🙌 It seems like a missing feature to have an alternative to the drag-and-drop functionality for sorting, rather than a bug. I will therefore convert this to a discussion. 🙂 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It's something we have in mind for V14, where the new sortting methods in the management API makes alternative UI easier. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Which Umbraco version are you using? (Please write the exact version, example: 10.1.0)
10.4.0
Bug summary
Some users cannot drag&drop, but they too should be able to arbitrarily re-order child nodes
Specifics
Sorting sub-nodes can be done in two ways
a) By clicking the column header in order to sort (alphabetically or by date)
b) By drag & drop in any order the user likes
This is quite good, but not enough: Users should be able to perform all actions even if they cannot perform drag & drop (eg. due to reduced mobility of the hands, or because of not being able to see the position of objects on the screen).
Steps to reproduce
Try to manually move one content node to another relative position (without changing parent node) without using a mouse or touch screen. Not possible.
Expected result / actual result
Alternative means for arbitrary reordering of items should be added. This could be, for example, a button for “move forward” and another for “move backward”, or perhaps just one button that will move in either direction but circle around when going beyond the first/last position. OR there could be an editable integer value for position in list.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions