Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About ablation study and L_Q loss #28

Open
imabackstabber opened this issue Dec 29, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

About ablation study and L_Q loss #28

imabackstabber opened this issue Dec 29, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@imabackstabber
Copy link

imabackstabber commented Dec 29, 2021

Hi,I'm wondering why ablation study in paper doesn't give result of using L_Q loss only.If the result is obviously worse than using L_C only,it will demonstrate what a role that L_C is playing in this task.
Also,I'm also curious about why using a loss that forcely pull prediction points to predefined hash center,which is a singular point that is hard to converge to(and I know that part is talked in paper).I just want to know why create a such a loss function and how much the importance is.
Your reply will be highly appreciated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant