Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CSL v1.1 support #62

Open
bdarcus opened this issue Jul 3, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

CSL v1.1 support #62

bdarcus opened this issue Jul 3, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@bdarcus
Copy link

bdarcus commented Jul 3, 2020

Just to note that at the CSL project, we're hoping to close work on v1.1 in the coming weeks.

The most significant changes/additions are features which are closely modeled on, or exactly the same as, those in CSL-M; notably the intext and conditions elements. So if you support those, should be trivial to support v1.1 also.

Dates on the input model are also changing, with priority going forward on EDTF.

Please weigh in if any feedback. We're currently discussing some big questions; cf citation-style-language/schema#268.

Also, v1.0.2 should be tagged in the next week; this adds new variables, types, terms mostly.

@bdarcus
Copy link
Author

bdarcus commented Jul 22, 2020

Two other conversations you should weigh in on @cormacrelf:

You can see the wider state of the data model changes and additions already merged most directly on the 1.1 branch csl-data schema.

Now would be a good time to affirm, or suggest changes. There's been a lot of activity on CSL over the past few months!

@bdarcus
Copy link
Author

bdarcus commented Nov 8, 2021

I was wondering: could we use this issue to update on where zotero and this project stands on the above?

Are we basically good ATM for example, after recent merged PRs for the json schema?

I'm particularly interested in thoughts on the rich-text schema, which is basically a strawman suggestion of how to formalize and generalize the current html-like tags.

If yes, you can probably close this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant