Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: add pint call to enforce initialization of unit registry #1146

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 15, 2024

Conversation

Czaki
Copy link
Collaborator

@Czaki Czaki commented Jul 15, 2024

Workaround for hgrecco/pint#2039

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Integrated pint library for unit management, improving flexibility and precision in handling measurements.

@Czaki Czaki added this to the 0.15.4 milestone Jul 15, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Jul 15, 2024

🧙 Sourcery has finished reviewing your pull request!


Tips
  • Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue your discussion with Sourcery by replying directly to review comments.
  • You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your dashboard:
    • Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide;
    • Change the review language;
  • You can always contact us if you have any questions or feedback.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 15, 2024

Walkthrough

A new import statement for pint has been added to the base_settings.py file in the common_backend package. Additionally, a call to pint.get_application_registry() with the parameter "nm" has been included within the __init__ method of a class, enhancing the initialization process by integrating the unit registry from the pint library.

Changes

Files Change Summary
package/PartSeg/common_backend/base_settings.py Added an import statement for pint and a call to pint.get_application_registry("nm") in the __init__ method of a class.

Poem

In code, where settings grow and gleam,
A unit registry, part of the dream.
With pint now in its rightful place,
Initialization finds its grace.
The backend sings a smoother tune,
As changes set the system to bloom.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We've reviewed this pull request using the Sourcery rules engine. If you would also like our AI-powered code review then let us know.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 733b168 and aa0742d.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • package/PartSeg/common_backend/base_settings.py (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
package/PartSeg/common_backend/base_settings.py (1)

16-16: LGTM!

The import statement for pint is correctly placed.

@@ -471,6 +472,7 @@ def __init__(self, json_path: Union[Path, str], profile_name: str = "default"):
self.history_index = -1
self.last_executed_algorithm = ""
self._points = None
pint.get_application_registry()("nm")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider storing the result of the pint.get_application_registry("nm") call.

The call to pint.get_application_registry("nm") ensures the initialization of the unit registry. Consider storing the result in a variable for potential future use or for clarity.

-    pint.get_application_registry()("nm")
+    registry = pint.get_application_registry("nm")

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 15, 2024

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between aa0742d and 3e34b5d.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • package/PartSeg/common_backend/base_settings.py (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • package/PartSeg/common_backend/base_settings.py

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.01%. Comparing base (733b168) to head (3e34b5d).
Report is 57 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #1146   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    93.01%   93.01%           
========================================
  Files          207      207           
  Lines        32656    32658    +2     
========================================
+ Hits         30374    30376    +2     
  Misses        2282     2282           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Czaki Czaki merged commit e13f990 into develop Jul 15, 2024
55 checks passed
@Czaki Czaki deleted the fix_units_threads branch July 15, 2024 10:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant