Update README for legacy branch #1858
Conversation
| @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ Azure service crates generated from [Azure REST API Specifications](https://gith | |||
|
|
|||
| ## Status | |||
|
|
|||
| 🚨 WARNING 🚨: This project is under active development. Be aware that large breaking changes will happen before 1.0 is reached. | |||
| 🚨 WARNING 🚨: This project is no longer under active development. Work on officially supported crates is being done in the `main` branch. Pull requests to `legacy` may be considered but are not guaranteed to be merged. Instead, you might consider forking this repository, creating a topic branch you'd need to submit a pull request anyway, and [override dependencies](https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/overriding-dependencies.html) in your `Cargo.toml` file(s) as necessary. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't like suggesting they fork. I'd rather they migrate to the new crates
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That text is already above. I'm taking into account - much further below in this file - that they may not be able to, especially before they are ready. We could opt not to suggest something (and I intentionally do not go into too many details), but that may just lead to more issues being opened. If that's the case, we should consider a bot response.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we say please migrate to the new crates or open issues/PRs against main. Forking as a last resort .....
// @ronniegeraghty Any opinions on this wording?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That text is already above. I'm taking into account - much further below in this file - that they may not be able to, especially before they are ready. We could opt not to suggest something (and I intentionally do not go into too many details), but that may just lead to more issues being opened. If that's the case, we should consider a bot response.
Makes sense. I'm hoping to get issues so we learn who was using these crates and which ones we might want to prioritize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe adding something like: "These crates should NEVER be used in a production setting."
Co-authored-by: Ronnie Geraghty <[email protected]>
|
Is this the text for the individual track 1 package |
It's the |
|
|
||
| > Microsoft is developing the official Azure SDK for Rust crates and has no plans to update this unofficial crate. | ||
| > Microsoft is developing the official Azure SDK for Rust crates and has no plans to update these unofficial crates. | ||
| > In the future we may release an official version that may have a different package name. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| > In the future we may release an official version that may have a different package name. | |
| > In the future we may release official versions that may have a different package names. |
No description provided.