Update doc layer types

[zoccoler]

Here is my attempt to update the documentation and solve #301 .

2 particular points I would like some feedback:

• I am not sure how to suggest to derive the tracking features, currently I just load them and show how to manually classify them in a gif
• I did not find a way via plugins to load "points features" to the Points layer, that is why I created Load features to Points layer and Surface layer from CSV file haesleinhuepf/napari-process-points-and-surfaces#89, currently I am explaining how to add them via code

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 77.20%. Comparing base (6d370c3) to head (b22e7bd).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
napari_clusters_plotter/_plotter.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #311      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   77.24%   77.20%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          16       16              
  Lines        1903     1904       +1     
==========================================
  Hits         1470     1470              
- Misses        433      434       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Cryaaa]

@zoccoler,
First of all thank you so much for taking care of this I love the examples you’ve added, very cool! As for the tracking data maybe @stefanhahmann can add a small explanation as to how the features were extracted? I think it was done with mastodon and I believe most tracking datasets would be generated by Fiji plugins but I’m also not very familiar with python/napari alternatives

[zoccoler]

Hi Stefan @stefanhahmann ,
what do you think about the generation of the tracking data? Should I keep the description as it is?

[stefanhahmann]

Hi Stefan @stefanhahmann , what do you think about the generation of the tracking data? Should I keep the description as it is?

I would recommend link these Notebooks as well: https://github.com/BiAPoL/napari-clusters-plotter-example-notebooks/tree/main/notebooks/mastodon

They show how the example data that I have added can be reproduced starting from Mastodon project. I am a bit unsure, if the better place to link this is the readme.md (e.g. after this line: https://github.com/BiAPoL/napari-clusters-plotter/pull/311/files#diff-b335630551682c19a781afebcf4d07bf978fb1f8ac04c6bf87428ed5106870f5R168) or the example notebook for the tracking layer type (i.e. loading_tracking_data_example.ipynb). @zoccoler what do you think?

[zoccoler]

Thanks @stefanhahmann ! I added a link to the readme now with a brief explanation.

[Cryaaa]

Awesome, then I don't see any issues with merging this!