ci: dependabot changeset push to use REPO_TOKEN
#2639
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nedsalk
requested review from
digorithm,
arboleya,
Torres-ssf,
Dhaiwat10,
danielbate,
petertonysmith94 and
maschad
as code owners
|
Good find, to test this I wonder if we could fork this repo, create a test secret |
|
@maschad I'm fairly certain that this is the root cause because this solution solved the same problem in #1848. IMO we don't need to go out of our way to test it; merging and verifying the behavior live is okay in this case because, even if this PR is a wrong solution, the workflow itself doesn't block anybody from work nor is it of crucial, "we must get this right the first time" importance. |
danielbate
approved these changes
Jun 28, 2024
arboleya
approved these changes
Jun 28, 2024
|
Coverage Report:
Changed Files:Coverage values did not change👌. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I believe that this is the same issue that plagued the changeset PR, which was solved in #1848.