Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Trapezoidal rule for RFs #458

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Trapezoidal rule for RFs #458

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

cncastillo
Copy link
Member

In this PR I want to:

  • Fix how RF blocks are determined, to properly consider step-wise linear B1(t) fields (consider RF block from t0+delay to t0+dur, instead of relying on when the RFs are 0, as that can generate some bugs like in -> B1=^^)
  • Enable negative delays, and MRIEvents's duration to be greater than one block
  • Clean current code using PreAlloc's to have a physical meaning
  • Test accuracy of new RF simulation

@cncastillo cncastillo marked this pull request as draft July 22, 2024 21:15
@cncastillo cncastillo mentioned this pull request Jul 31, 2024
Merged
@cncastillo cncastillo linked an issue Sep 2, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Add 2nd-order Runge Kutta for RF excitation #201
Open
@cncastillo cncastillo mentioned this pull request Sep 4, 2024
Open
@cncastillo cncastillo mentioned this pull request Oct 1, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add 2nd-order Runge Kutta for RF excitation
1 participant
@cncastillo