-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Number every problem reported by nixpkgs-vet
#109
Conversation
This tool is called `nixpkgs-vet`. Implicitly, every thing it talks about is prefixed by "nixpkgs", so it doesn't need the explicit prefix.
We have to do a little work to transition the callsite, but it all works.
It's more about structure than anything else, and it's used here primarily.
Let's automate it with the `derive-new` proc macro.
… with their NPV number in their module
I'll get a chance to look at this closer tomorrow or this weekend |
Gentle ping to review if you've got the cycles to spend. |
@philiptaron Sorry for the wait! Seems like good changes all around to me. More widespread usage of |
Nice work @philiptaron, and thanks for reviewing @willbush! Sorry that I'm not very available recently 😅 |
Motivation for changes
Description of changes
nixpkgs-vet
Display
with the exact same error as previouslyto_validation
closureThis PR is best reviewed commit-by-commit.