A comprehensive security scanning tool for analyzing project directories and generating detailed security reports.
- Secret Detection (API keys, tokens, passwords)
- Vulnerability Pattern Analysis
- Security Configuration Assessment
- Dependency Analysis
- Code Quality Metrics
- Access Control Verification
- SSL/TLS Configuration Analysis
- File Permission Checks
- .htaccess Analysis
- Multi-threaded scanning for improved performance
- PDF report generation
- Detailed JSON reports
- Configurable scanning rules
- Logging system
- Custom configuration support
- File type detection
- Size limit enforcement
# Clone the repository
git clone https://github.com/yourusername/security-scanner
# Install required dependencies
pip install -r requirements.txt
- Python 3.8+
- Required packages:
- fpdf==2.7.0
- python-magic==0.4.27
- pyyaml==6.0.1
- typing-extensions==4.5.0
python security_scorer.py /path/to/project
python security_scorer.py /path/to/project --pdf
python security_scorer.py /path/to/project --config custom_config.yml
Create a config.yml
file to customize the scanner:
min_password_length: 8
max_file_size_mb: 100
allowed_file_types:
- .py
- .js
- .php
- .java
excluded_dirs:
- node_modules
- venv
- __pycache__
{
"scan_time": "2024-10-23T10:00:00",
"project_path": "/path/to/project",
"security_score": 85.5,
"findings": [
{
"type": "secret_exposed",
"severity": "HIGH",
"description": "API key found in configuration file",
"file": "config.py",
"line": 42
}
],
"summary": {
"total_findings": 10,
"high_severity": 2,
"medium_severity": 5,
"low_severity": 3
},
"scan_metadata": {
"python_version": "3.8.0",
"os_platform": "Linux-5.4.0-x86_64",
"scanner_version": "2.0.0"
}
}
-
False Positives
- Pattern-based detection may flag legitimate code
- Context-awareness is limited
- Some safe configurations might be flagged as vulnerable
-
Performance
- Large projects may take significant time to scan
- Memory usage increases with project size
- PDF generation can be slow for large reports
-
Language Support
- Primary focus on web technologies
- Limited support for compiled languages
- Some framework-specific patterns may be missed
-
Environment Constraints
- Requires file system access permissions
- Some checks are OS-dependent
- Network access needed for certain dependency checks
-
Detection Scope
- Cannot detect logical security flaws
- Limited to known patterns and signatures
- Runtime vulnerabilities may be missed
- Complex attack vectors might not be detected
-
Analysis Depth
- No dynamic analysis capability
- Cannot verify if detected vulnerabilities are exploitable
- Limited context awareness for detected issues
-
Coverage
- May not cover all security standards
- Framework-specific security features might be missed
- Custom security implementations may generate false positives
-
Regular Scanning
- Run scans as part of CI/CD pipeline
- Perform scans before major releases
- Schedule periodic security assessments
-
Configuration
- Customize patterns for your tech stack
- Maintain an allow-list for known safe patterns
- Regular updates to security patterns
-
Report Handling
- Review all high-severity findings
- Maintain a findings database
- Track security score trends
- Document false positives
[Previous documentation sections remain the same until Limitations section]
-
Static Analysis Constraints
- Limited to static code analysis without runtime context
- Cannot detect vulnerabilities that only manifest during execution
- May miss sophisticated obfuscated vulnerabilities
- No ability to trace data flow across multiple files effectively
-
Performance Bottlenecks
- Sequential file processing for large codebases
- High memory usage when scanning large projects
- PDF generation can be resource-intensive
- Limited parallelization of complex pattern matching
- No incremental scanning capability
-
Language and Framework Limitations
- Primary focus on web technologies (PHP, JavaScript, Python)
- Limited support for compiled languages
- No understanding of framework-specific security features
- Cannot analyze binary files or compiled code
- Limited analysis of template languages
- No support for WebAssembly
-
Detection Accuracy
- False positives in complex code patterns
- Cannot detect logical security flaws
- Limited context awareness
- No semantic analysis capability
- Pattern-based detection may miss variants
- Cannot verify if vulnerabilities are exploitable
-
Configuration Management
- Manual configuration updates required
- No automatic pattern learning
- Static rule sets
- Limited customization of severity levels
- No integration with security databases
-
Integration Limitations
- No native CI/CD pipeline integration
- Limited API functionality
- No real-time monitoring capability
- No automatic remediation suggestions
- No integration with issue tracking systems
- Limited version control system integration
-
Reporting Constraints
- Static PDF format
- No interactive reports
- Limited visualization options
- No historical trend analysis
- No compliance mapping
- Limited customization of report templates
-
Dependency Analysis
- No automatic vulnerability database updates
- Limited to known vulnerability patterns
- No transitive dependency analysis
- Cannot verify patch status
- No automatic version checking
-
Access Control
- No role-based access control
- Limited multi-user support
- No audit logging of scanner usage
- No team collaboration features
-
Environmental Limitations
- OS-dependent functionality
- Required external dependencies
- Limited cloud environment support
- No containerization support
- Platform-specific constraints
-
Enhanced Detection Engine
- Implement machine learning-based pattern detection
- Add semantic analysis capabilities
- Improve context awareness
- Reduce false positives
- Add support for more languages
- Implementation timeline: Q4 2024
-
Performance Optimization
- Implement incremental scanning
- Add distributed scanning capability
- Optimize pattern matching algorithms
- Improve memory management
- Add caching mechanisms
- Expected completion: Q1 2025
-
Integration Enhancement
- Develop CI/CD plugins (Jenkins, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI)
- Create IDE extensions (VSCode, IntelliJ)
- Build REST API
- Add webhook support
- Timeline: Q1-Q2 2025
-
Dynamic Analysis
- Runtime vulnerability detection
- Active security testing
- Behavior analysis
- API security testing
- Timeline: Q2-Q3 2025
-
Intelligent Reporting
- Interactive web dashboard
- Custom report templates
- Trend analysis
- Risk scoring improvements
- Compliance reporting
- Implementation: Q3 2025
-
Automated Remediation
- Auto-fix suggestions
- Code transformation tools
- Security best practice enforcement
- Expected release: Q4 2025
-
Enterprise Integration
- LDAP/Active Directory integration
- Single Sign-On (SSO)
- Role-based access control
- Audit logging
- Timeline: Q1 2026
-
Advanced Analytics
- Security metrics dashboard
- Predictive analytics
- Custom scoring models
- Risk assessment
- Expected completion: Q2 2026
-
Collaboration Features
- Team workflows
- Issue tracking integration
- Knowledge base
- Custom rules sharing
- Timeline: Q2-Q3 2026
-
AI-Powered Analysis
- Zero-day vulnerability detection
- Behavioral analysis
- Pattern learning
- Context-aware scanning
- Timeline: Q4 2026
-
Cloud Native Support
- Kubernetes security scanning
- Cloud configuration analysis
- Serverless function scanning
- Container security
- Expected release: Q1 2027
-
Advanced Security Features
- Binary analysis
- Firmware scanning
- IoT device security
- Supply chain security
- Timeline: Q2 2027
- False positive reduction
- Performance optimization
- CI/CD integration
- API development
- Report enhancement
- Dynamic analysis
- Enterprise features
- Cloud support
- Collaboration tools
- Advanced analytics
- AI integration
- Binary analysis
- IoT security
- Supply chain security
- Predictive analytics
- Senior security engineers
- ML/AI specialists
- Full-stack developers
- QA engineers
- DevOps specialists
- Cloud computing resources
- Testing environments
- CI/CD pipeline
- Development tools
- Security testing lab
- Security databases
- Vulnerability feeds
- API services
- Cloud providers
- Testing frameworks
-
Technical Metrics
- False positive rate < 5%
- Scan time reduced by 50%
- 99.9% uptime
- 90% code coverage
-
Business Metrics
- Enterprise adoption rate
- Customer satisfaction
- Market share
- Revenue growth
-
Security Metrics
- Vulnerability detection rate
- Time to detection
- Risk reduction
- Compliance coverage
This roadmap is subject to change based on:
- User feedback
- Technology advances
- Security landscape
- Resource availability
- Market demands
We welcome community input and contributions to help prioritize and implement these improvements.
Current -> Expected
----------------------------------------
80% accuracy -> 95% accuracy
10% false -> 2% false positives
positives
5 languages -> 12 languages
Manual rules -> AI-assisted rules
-
Machine Learning Integration
- Neural network-based pattern detection
- Training on 1M+ code samples
- Real-time pattern learning
- Expected accuracy improvement: 15%
# Example of planned ML integration class MLDetectionEngine: def __init__(self): self.model = load_pretrained_model() self.pattern_database = DynamicPatternDB() def analyze_code(self, code_snippet): features = self.extract_features(code_snippet) prediction = self.model.predict(features) self.pattern_database.update(prediction)
-
Semantic Analysis
- AST-based code analysis
- Control flow tracking
- Data flow analysis
- Cross-file reference tracking
- Expected false positive reduction: 80%
Metric Current -> Target
----------------------------------------
Scan Speed 100 LOC/s -> 1000 LOC/s
Memory Usage 2GB/1M LOC -> 500MB/1M LOC
CPU Usage 85% -> 40%
Parallel Tasks 4 -> 16
# Planned optimization structure
class OptimizedScanner:
def __init__(self):
self.thread_pool = ThreadPool(16)
self.cache_manager = LRUCache(max_size=1000)
self.pattern_matcher = AhoCorasick()
async def scan_project(self):
chunks = self.divide_into_chunks()
results = await asyncio.gather(*map(self.scan_chunk, chunks))
// Planned REST API Structure
interface SecurityScanAPI {
startScan(projectConfig: ScanConfig): Promise<ScanJob>;
getScanStatus(jobId: string): Promise<ScanStatus>;
getScanResults(jobId: string): Promise<ScanResults>;
configureScan(config: SecurityConfig): Promise<void>;
}
# Example GitHub Actions Integration
name: Security Scan
on: [push, pull_request]
jobs:
security_scan:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: security-scanner/github-action@v2
- name: Run Security Scan
with:
scan_depth: deep
report_format: sarif
interface EnhancedReport {
summary: {
score: number;
trends: TrendData[];
recommendations: Priority[];
};
findings: {
critical: Finding[];
high: Finding[];
medium: Finding[];
low: Finding[];
};
metrics: {
coverage: Coverage;
performance: Performance;
compliance: ComplianceStatus;
};
}
// Planned D3.js Integration
const securityDashboard = {
trendChart: () => {
return d3.select('#trends')
.append('svg')
.data(securityTrends)
.enter()
// Advanced visualization logic
},
riskHeatmap: () => {
// Risk distribution visualization
}
};
class SecurityAI:
def __init__(self):
self.vulnerability_detector = TransformerModel()
self.pattern_learner = LSTM()
self.code_analyzer = CodeBERT()
async def analyze_code(self, code: str):
embeddings = self.code_analyzer.encode(code)
vulnerabilities = await self.vulnerability_detector(embeddings)
new_patterns = self.pattern_learner.learn(vulnerabilities)
return self.generate_report(vulnerabilities, new_patterns)
Feature Current -> Target
--------------------------------------------
Pattern Detection 90% -> 99%
Zero-day Detection None -> 70%
False Positives 5% -> 0.1%
Analysis Speed 1x -> 10x
graph TD
A[Enterprise Gateway] --> B[Load Balancer]
B --> C[Scanner Cluster]
B --> D[Analytics Engine]
B --> E[Report Generator]
F[LDAP/SSO] --> A
G[Admin Console] --> A
H[API Gateway] --> A
Feature Target
--------------------------------
Concurrent Users 10,000+
Scan Concurrency 1,000+
Response Time <100ms
Availability 99.99%
Data Retention 7 years
apiVersion: security.k8s.io/v1
kind: SecurityScan
metadata:
name: cluster-security-scan
spec:
scanType: Deep
resources:
- deployments
- services
- ingress
schedule: "0 0 * * *"
reportFormat: SARIF
- AWS Security Hub integration
- Azure Security Center integration
- GCP Security Command Center integration
- Custom cloud provider adapters
interface ComplianceEngine {
frameworks: {
ISO27001: Framework;
HIPAA: Framework;
GDPR: Framework;
SOC2: Framework;
PCI: Framework;
};
mapFindings(findings: Finding[]): ComplianceReport;
generateEvidence(): Evidence[];
trackRemediation(): RemediationPlan;
}
Framework Current -> Target
------------------------------------
ISO27001 60% -> 100%
HIPAA 40% -> 100%
GDPR 50% -> 100%
SOC2 45% -> 100%
PCI-DSS 55% -> 100%
Metric Target
----------------------------------------
Scan Speed >1000 LOC/sec
Memory Efficiency <500MB/1M LOC
CPU Utilization <40%
False Positive Rate <0.1%
Detection Accuracy >99%
API Response Time <100ms
Concurrent Scans >1000
Metric Target
----------------------------------------
Enterprise Adoption >1000 companies
Customer Satisfaction >95%
Market Share >30%
Revenue Growth >100% YoY
Customer Retention >95%
Metric Target
----------------------------------------
Zero-day Detection >70%
Vulnerability Coverage >99%
Time to Detection <1 minute
Risk Reduction >90%
Compliance Coverage 100%
Role Count
----------------------------------------
Security Engineers 10
ML/AI Specialists 5
Full-stack Developers 8
QA Engineers 6
DevOps Engineers 4
Technical Writers 2
Resource Specification
----------------------------------------
Compute 128 CPU cores
Memory 512GB RAM
Storage 10TB SSD
Network 10Gbps
GPU 4x NVIDIA A100
This comprehensive improvement plan will be implemented iteratively, with regular feedback loops and adjustments based on user needs and emerging security threats.
We welcome community contributions and feedback to help prioritize and implement these improvements effectively.
Contributions are welcome! Please follow these steps:
- Fork the repository
- Create a feature branch
- Commit your changes
- Push to the branch
- Submit a pull request
MIT License - See LICENSE file for details
For issues and feature requests, please use the GitHub issue tracker.
-
Enhanced Detection
- Machine learning-based pattern detection
- Additional language support
- Custom rule creation UI
-
Integration
- CI/CD pipeline plugins
- IDE integrations
- API endpoint for remote scanning
-
Reporting
- Interactive web dashboard
- Trend analysis
- Custom report templates
-
Performance
- Incremental scanning
- Distributed scanning capability
- Optimized pattern matching
- Added PDF report generation
- Enhanced pattern detection
- Multi-threaded scanning
- Improved configuration system
- Added .htaccess analysis
- Enhanced SSL/TLS checks
- Initial release
- Basic security scanning
- JSON reports
- Configuration support