-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(APIv2): RHINENG-13402 enable multidimensional sort in OpenAPI spec #2232
Draft
romanblanco
wants to merge
1
commit into
RedHatInsights:master
Choose a base branch
from
romanblanco:RHINENG-13402-sort-by-entry-missing
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is the
style: :form
needed?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Following rswag documentation: https://github.com/rswag/rswag/wiki/FAQ#for-openapi-3
https://swagger.io/docs/specification/v3_0/serialization/#query-parameters
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, still don't understand why is this needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
form – (default) ampersand-separated values, also known as form-style query expansion. Corresponds to the {?param_name} URI template.
I believe this is the option we want to use.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If it's default, why do we need this now? The format checks out, we only need the
explode
as far as I understand.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And why just here be explicit? If it's a default value, it should be consistent across all parameters in the whole specification. So either change it everywhere to
style: form
or please delete this.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We want this to be applied on those parameters of
type: :array
. Where else do you see this missing?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If this is default (which is), it means it is applied to everything, not just the
type: :array
so I am asking again, why is this case so special that you want to have an explicit setting that is already implicitly set on it? Why and how is this one single case different from all the other parameters that may or may not have atype: :array
which is not connected to the formatting that you are trying to set now explicitly?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The referenced ticket answers your question.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No it doesn't, you have 2 independent attributes that you are for some reason try to bind into a single context. One of them is default, so its setting is irrelevant and to maintain consistency across the OpenAPI spec, it makes no sense to explicitly specify in a single location.