Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/multimaterial simulation #24

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

RafaelPalomar
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR adds a multi-material simulation using surface meshes (instead of tetrahedral). Two box ROIs define the points of the mesh that corresponds to fixed points and movable points. This simulation includes testing

@RafaelPalomar RafaelPalomar marked this pull request as draft July 18, 2024 15:49
Co-authored-by: Nazim Haouchine <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Andras Lasso <[email protected]>
@RafaelPalomar RafaelPalomar force-pushed the feature/multimaterial_simulation branch from 9dc96c8 to afa1d4e Compare July 18, 2024 20:21
RafaelPalomar and others added 2 commits July 18, 2024 22:32
This commit simplifies the code for data communication between
SOFA and Slicer. In addition, the code enables transfer of the
simulation surface node to SOFA.

Co-authored-by: Paul Baksic <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Steve Pieper <[email protected]>
@RafaelPalomar RafaelPalomar force-pushed the feature/multimaterial_simulation branch 2 times, most recently from f544d91 to ce4b413 Compare July 18, 2024 21:14
@RafaelPalomar RafaelPalomar marked this pull request as ready for review July 18, 2024 21:17
@RafaelPalomar RafaelPalomar force-pushed the feature/multimaterial_simulation branch from ce4b413 to f803889 Compare July 29, 2024 11:45
@RafaelPalomar RafaelPalomar force-pushed the feature/multimaterial_simulation branch from f803889 to fc87e08 Compare July 29, 2024 11:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants