Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MS5611 (Barometer #1) Implementation #146

Open
DrewBrandt opened this issue Sep 23, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #154
Open

MS5611 (Barometer #1) Implementation #146

DrewBrandt opened this issue Sep 23, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #154
Assignees
Labels
code Software and coding focused task good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@DrewBrandt
Copy link
Contributor

DrewBrandt commented Sep 23, 2024

Write code interact with an MS5611 over I2C. Using an external library is fine for this (See MMFS's dependency on SparkFun's GNSS v3 library and our MAX-M10s's implementation of it as an example).

The sensor will need an int() method to establish communication and set up configuration, and a read() that reads the registers and updates the appropriate variables.

These classes should be pretty simple and most of the work will come in either determining what to write to the registers or which library to use to write to the registers for us.

@DrewBrandt DrewBrandt added good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed code Software and coding focused task labels Sep 23, 2024
@DrewBrandt DrewBrandt changed the title MS5611 (Barometer) Implementation MS5611 (Barometer #1) Implementation Sep 23, 2024
@Azhanzz Azhanzz self-assigned this Sep 23, 2024
@DrewBrandt DrewBrandt removed the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Sep 25, 2024
@DrewBrandt DrewBrandt linked a pull request Oct 1, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
code Software and coding focused task good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
Status: Ready
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants