Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16.0] chain a dest move without restrict_lot_id #6

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: 16.0-imp-propagation_of_restrict_lot_changes
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

emiliesoutiras
Copy link

update move chaining must fill restrict_lot_id if one of the chained moves doesn't have it

Kev-Roche and others added 3 commits April 4, 2024 16:17
… if in a chain and don't block an update if a move has already been done in the chain with this particular lot
…strict_lot_changes

[IMP] stock_restrict_lot : update restrict lot at stock move creation…
@github-grap-bot
Copy link

Hi @florian-dacosta,
some modules you are maintaining are being modified, check this out!

@emiliesoutiras emiliesoutiras force-pushed the 16.0-fix-propagation_of_restrict_lot_on_write branch from 2c79266 to ccc5c05 Compare June 13, 2024 15:31
@emiliesoutiras emiliesoutiras changed the title chain a dest move without lot_id [16.0] chain a dest move without lot_id Jun 13, 2024
@emiliesoutiras emiliesoutiras changed the title [16.0] chain a dest move without lot_id [16.0] chain a dest move without restrict_lot_id Jun 13, 2024
@Kev-Roche Kev-Roche force-pushed the 16.0-imp-propagation_of_restrict_lot_changes branch 2 times, most recently from c49b142 to 4798a2f Compare August 21, 2024 14:50
@Kev-Roche Kev-Roche force-pushed the 16.0-imp-propagation_of_restrict_lot_changes branch 3 times, most recently from 2572c48 to 997ccc3 Compare September 2, 2024 17:59
@Kev-Roche Kev-Roche force-pushed the 16.0-imp-propagation_of_restrict_lot_changes branch 5 times, most recently from a857e15 to bfe78eb Compare September 20, 2024 16:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants